India-first HRMS · Built by ImpacteersExplore the ecosystem
Connected monthly operations

Move approved attendance outcomes into payroll without another reconciliation layer.

Connect resolved attendance, unpaid leave, overtime and allowances to payroll through one employee, policy and effective-date foundation.

Representative operating scenario Current boundaries stated clearly
Payroll control roomIllustrative interaction
1Initiate2Compute3Review4Approve5Finalise
Readiness check
Owner and history remain visible
482Employees
31Inputs pending
DraftRun status
Who this page is for

For organisations replacing separate attendance and payroll systems or repeated spreadsheet handoffs.

Representative scenario

The payroll run should use approved attendance loss-of-pay and overtime rather than a manually edited export.

The operating problem

What usually breaks before the software conversation begins.

Use these symptoms to determine whether the issue is data, policy, ownership, monthly closure or an unsupported product requirement.

01

Employee IDs and organisational dimensions differ across systems.

02

Attendance is exported before approval closure.

03

Corrections must be copied into payroll manually.

04

The reason for a payroll deduction is difficult to trace.

A practical operating approach

Resolve the policy first, then automate the cycle.

The exact product setup is validated during discovery and demonstration. The sequence below keeps the rule, owner and downstream result connected.

01

Use one employee foundation

Keep the employee, location, grade, employment type and effective date consistent across modules.

02

Resolve attendance first

Apply policy, corrections, leave and overtime approvals in the operating system.

03

Feed only approved outcomes

Move accepted loss-of-pay, overtime and allowance values to payroll.

04

Review payroll variance

Trace material movement back to the originating attendance or employee event.

Evaluation questions

Confirm the exact policy, evidence and product boundary.

The answers below reflect the supplied product source. Customer-specific commitments still require live-product and commercial validation.

Bring this use case into a demo
Can attendance corrections update payroll inputs?

The connected product positioning supports approved attendance outcomes flowing to payroll; cut-offs and reprocessing rules should be configured and demonstrated.

Can unpaid leave and attendance loss-of-pay overlap?

The payroll material says the two are merged to avoid double deduction.

Does integration require a separate connector?

Within duoHR the modules share a product foundation; external devices or systems may require a validated import, SFTP or API path.

Connected monthly operations

Validate this use case with one real policy or transaction.

Bring a representative employee, location, shift, payroll month or output. We will shape the walkthrough around the exact operating case.