India-first HRMS · Built by ImpacteersExplore the ecosystem
India statutory payroll output

Connect payroll computation with the PF ECR output your team actually submits.

Configure PF-eligible components, review employee and employer contribution values and prepare the supported PF ECR 2.0 output as part of the payroll close.

Representative operating scenario Current boundaries stated clearly
Payroll control roomIllustrative interaction
1Initiate2Compute3Review4Approve5Finalise
Readiness check
Owner and history remain visible
482Employees
31Inputs pending
DraftRun status
Who this page is for

For Indian payroll teams evaluating whether the HRMS can produce usable statutory outputs—not only payslip calculations.

Representative scenario

Payroll must derive the PF wage base from configured eligible components and produce a filing-ready supported output after review.

The operating problem

What usually breaks before the software conversation begins.

Use these symptoms to determine whether the issue is data, policy, ownership, monthly closure or an unsupported product requirement.

01

PF logic is separated from salary component configuration.

02

The team validates totals but not employee-level contribution values.

03

Filing files are prepared manually after payroll finalisation.

04

Unsupported claims about statutory coverage create implementation risk.

A practical operating approach

Resolve the policy first, then automate the cycle.

The exact product setup is validated during discovery and demonstration. The sequence below keeps the rule, owner and downstream result connected.

01

Configure eligible components

Use the salary component catalogue and approved PF eligibility flags.

02

Compute and review

Inspect employee and employer values within the reversible payroll run.

03

Validate exceptions

Resolve missing identifiers or unusual values before finalisation.

04

Prepare the supported output

Generate the documented PF ECR 2.0 file after authorised payroll approval.

Evaluation questions

Confirm the exact policy, evidence and product boundary.

The answers below reflect the supplied product source. Customer-specific commitments still require live-product and commercial validation.

Bring this use case into a demo
Does duoHR describe PF ECR 2.0 output?

Yes. The consolidated payroll material lists PF ECR 2.0 as a supported output.

Does duoHR generate Form 16?

No. Form 16 generation is explicitly listed as outside the documented current scope.

Should statutory values be reverified before launch?

Yes. Statutory configuration, rates and filing behaviour require current payroll and legal validation before customer commitment.

India statutory payroll output

Validate this use case with one real policy or transaction.

Bring a representative employee, location, shift, payroll month or output. We will shape the walkthrough around the exact operating case.